IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i6p1360-1366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Danger may enhance communication: predator calls alert females to male displays

Author

Listed:
  • Emma I. Greig
  • Stephen Pruett-Jones

Abstract

Sexual displays are typically given in the absence of predators. One possible exception to this is seen in male splendid fairy-wrens (Malurus splendens), which sing display-like vocalizations (Type II song) in response to predator calls. In this study, we explored the function of this vocal "hitchhiking" using playback experiments. We documented that: 1) males responded to Type II songs of other males as if they were displays intended for conspecifics, 2) females became more attentive after hearing a predator vocalization than a control (nonpredator) vocalization, and 3) females tended to respond more strongly to Type II songs when the songs were preceded by a predator vocalization than when they were given solo. Males of all age and status classes produced Type II songs and production was not dependent on any of 3 morphological measures of male quality, so we do not find evidence to support the hypothesis that Type II singing behavior is condition dependent. Because predator calls increased female attentiveness and tended to increase subsequent response to Type II songs, it appears that males may be using predator vocalizations as alerting signals for their own conspecific-directed displays. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma I. Greig & Stephen Pruett-Jones, 2010. "Danger may enhance communication: predator calls alert females to male displays," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(6), pages 1360-1366.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:6:p:1360-1366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq155
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:6:p:1360-1366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.