IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i6p1285-1292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Presence of mammalian predators decreases tolerance to human disturbance in a breeding shorebird

Author

Listed:
  • James J.H. St Clair
  • Gabriel E. García-Peña
  • Robin W. Woods
  • Tamás Székely

Abstract

Nonlethal disturbance can impose fitness costs, particularly during sensitive life history stages such as reproduction. Prey animals are thus expected to assess the costs and benefits of expressing antipredator behavior in different circumstances and to respond optimally according to the perceived risk of predation. One prediction of this hypothesis is that the response to nonlethal disturbance should be elevated when the risk of predation is high, although few studies have tested this prediction with respect to the distribution of actual predators in nature. We used landscape-level variation in the distribution of large mammalian predators (feral cats) to investigate antipredator behavior in a small breeding shorebird, the Two-banded Plover Charadrius falklandicus. We used 8 sites in the Falkland Islands and Argentina and measured the flushing distances of incubating Two-banded Plovers in response to a controlled human approach to the nest. We found that flushing distances were increased at sites where mammalian predators were present and decreased where exposure to humans was high. These effects were additive, and we interpret them as the effects of generalization and habituation, respectively. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • James J.H. St Clair & Gabriel E. García-Peña & Robin W. Woods & Tamás Székely, 2010. "Presence of mammalian predators decreases tolerance to human disturbance in a breeding shorebird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(6), pages 1285-1292.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:6:p:1285-1292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq144
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:6:p:1285-1292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.