IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i6p1203-1210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sophistication and simplicity: conventional communication in a rudimentary system

Author

Listed:
  • Paweł Ręk
  • Tomasz S. Osiejuk

Abstract

Conventional communication, like human speech or the bee dance, consists of arbitrary signals associated with meaning through convention. Acoustic conventions seem to be frequent among passerine birds having song repertoire variability, but such behaviors are unknown in nonpasserine species producing simple calls. Because the variability of vocalizations is relatively small in nonpasserine birds, no study has investigated their ability to create conventional signals. We experimentally show here that Corncrake males (Crex crex), modifying rhythm in simple 2-syllable calls, signal their neighbors about their aggressive motivation. Males responded more aggressively (approached the speaker and attacked it) to playbacks with intermittent than with monotonous rhythm, and males calling with a more intermittent rhythm were more aggressive. The presence of convention in this system requires that the production of alternative signals is not linked with differential production costs. In Corncrakes, aggressiveness is signaled by a signal with lower production cost (lower call rate) than the lack of aggressiveness, and our results indicate that the honesty of the rhythm is maintained by a receiver retaliation cost rather than by production costs. Our observations suggest that temporal organization of signals in Corncrakes is an example of syntax, equivalent to a very simple Morse code system. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Paweł Ręk & Tomasz S. Osiejuk, 2010. "Sophistication and simplicity: conventional communication in a rudimentary system," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(6), pages 1203-1210.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:6:p:1203-1210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq143
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:6:p:1203-1210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.