IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i6p1179-1185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The strength of postcopulatory sexual selection within natural populations of field crickets

Author

Listed:
  • Leigh W. Simmons
  • Maxine Beveridge

Abstract

Sperm competition and cryptic female choice are likely to exert strong postcopulatory sexual selection and may amplify or ameliorate selection acting via male mating success. However, relatively few studies have estimated the potential strength of postcopulatory sexual selection acting within natural populations. Field crickets in the genus Teleogryllus have been used extensively as laboratory models to study the evolution of polyandry, and the mechanisms of sperm competition and cryptic female choice. However, we have no knowledge of the extent of multiple mating or patterns of sperm utilization in natural populations of these crickets. We used microsatellite loci to examine the strength of postcopulatory sexual selection in Teleogryllus oceanicus and T. commodus. Genotyping of sperm within sperm storage organs revealed high levels of multiple mating by females in both species, but females utilized sperm from just 75% and 60% of their mates, respectively. Paternity was skewed toward a subset of fathers; skew was strongest in T. oceanicus and declined with the number of fathers represented in both species. Thus, postcopulatory sexual selection is strong in natural populations of both species and must be taken into account when estimating total sexual selection acting on these species. More generally, we argue that more effort should be made to measure the strength of postcopulatory sexual selection in other species, and to integrate episodes of pre- and postcopulatory selection, if we are to gain an accurate appreciation of the evolutionary consequences of sexual selection. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Leigh W. Simmons & Maxine Beveridge, 2010. "The strength of postcopulatory sexual selection within natural populations of field crickets," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(6), pages 1179-1185.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:6:p:1179-1185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq132
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leigh W. Simmons, 2012. "Resource allocation trade-off between sperm quality and immunity in the field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 168-173.
    2. Brian Gray & Leigh W. Simmons, 2013. "Acoustic cues alter perceived sperm competition risk in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 982-986.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:6:p:1179-1185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.