Author
Listed:
- Matthew J. Greenlees
- Benjamin L. Phillips
- Richard Shine
Abstract
Biological invasions provide opportunities to study novel behavioral interactions between predators and their prey. To withstand detrimental effects from a potentially lethal invader, a native taxon must somehow adjust to the invader's presence. Cane toads (Bufo marinus) are highly toxic to native Australian anurans and constitute a major threat if consumed. We recorded the responses of Australian marbled frogs (Limnodynastes convexiusculus) during their first encounters with edible-sized cane toads. The frogs exhibited rapid avoidance learning: toad-exposed frogs were less likely to attack subsequently encountered cane toads (and hence more likely to survive). Among-clutch variance in learning rates and in physiological tolerance to toad toxins was low, suggesting that genetically based adaptive changes to frog feeding responses will be slow (especially given that rapid learning reduces mortality and thus reduces the fitness decrement of initial willingness to attack a toad). Hence, rapid taste aversion learning is the primary mechanism enabling marbled frogs to persist in the presence of a potentially fatal invader. In combination with previous work, our study shows that some native predators adjust to the threat posed by cane toad invasion via taste aversion learning, whereas others show genetically based modification of feeding responses. More generally, both learning and adaptation enable vulnerable native taxa to survive the arrival of a toxic invasive species. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Matthew J. Greenlees & Benjamin L. Phillips & Richard Shine, 2010.
"Adjusting to a toxic invader: native Australian frogs learn not to prey on cane toads,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(5), pages 966-971.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:5:p:966-971
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- repec:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:3:p:659-664. is not listed on IDEAS
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:5:p:966-971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.