IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i4p788-793.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Immune system activation affects song and territorial defense

Author

Listed:
  • Nicole E. Munoz
  • Daniel T. Blumstein
  • Johannes Foufopoulos

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that bird song is influenced by infection. We investigated how mounting an immune response by mountain white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys oriantha) affects specific aspects of territorial song and behavior. We used song playback to simulate a territorial intrusion and elicit baseline song and behavioral responses. Individuals were then either injected with a saline control or with a lipopolysaccharide (LPS) solution to induce an acute immune response, and posttreatment territorial song and behaviors in response to playback were recorded 1 day and 7 days later. The immune challenge significantly reduced the number of birds that sang compared with control individuals on Day 1. All birds that sang on Day 1 produced abnormal songs with fewer terminal notes, exhibited elevated alarm behavior, and tended to sing at slower rates. By Day 7, LPS treatment had no effect on the likelihood of singing, and song rates had returned to baseline levels, though songs were still sung with fewer terminal notes. Thus, our study shows that simply mounting an immune response to infection, as opposed to the actual infection per se is sufficient to impact avian song production. This study also suggests that for the most sensitive assessment of immune status, familiarity with an individual's song and behavior is necessary. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicole E. Munoz & Daniel T. Blumstein & Johannes Foufopoulos, 2010. "Immune system activation affects song and territorial defense," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(4), pages 788-793.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:4:p:788-793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq054
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:4:p:788-793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.