Author
Listed:
- Per T. Smiseth
- Clare Andrews
- Erica Brown
- Pamela M. Prentice
Abstract
In birds, nestling begging is often triggered by visual or acoustic stimuli from parents. Although begging occurs in some insects, it is not known whether it is triggered by specific parental stimuli. The burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides has attracted interest as an insect system for studying parent--offspring communication. Recent work on this species suggests that begging is triggered by chemical stimuli from parents. In support of this hypothesis, we found that larvae begged less toward female parents that had been washed in pentane as a means to remove chemical stimuli than toward unwashed female parents and that they begged more toward filter paper rubbed against female parents than toward untreated filter paper. Previous work on N. vespilloides suggests that chemical stimuli from parents might provide a mechanism for larval kin recognition. In support of this hypothesis, we found that larvae begged more toward breeding females than toward nonbreeding females, although there was no evidence that larvae actively avoided contact with nonbreeding females. We found no evidence that larvae discriminated between their biological female parents and unrelated breeding females. We conclude that chemical stimuli from parents trigger larval begging and may allow for larval kin discrimination. However, our results suggest that larval kin discrimination is a by-product of stimulus discrimination based on cues that are incidentally correlated with kinship rather than an adaptive mechanism for avoiding contact with nonbreeding females. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Per T. Smiseth & Clare Andrews & Erica Brown & Pamela M. Prentice, 2010.
"Chemical stimuli from parents trigger larval begging in burying beetles,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(3), pages 526-531.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:3:p:526-531
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- repec:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:4:p:898-906. is not listed on IDEAS
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:3:p:526-531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.