IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i2p424-430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mate choice in the dung beetle Onthophagus sagittarius: are female horns ornaments?

Author

Listed:
  • Nicola L. Watson
  • Leigh W. Simmons

Abstract

Sexual selection typically operates via male contest competition and female choice, favoring the evolution of secondary sexual traits in males. However, there are numerous taxa in which females possess secondary sexual traits and the selective pressures operating on female ornamentation are not well understood. We examined sexual selection operating via mate choice in the dung beetle Onthophagus sagittarius, a species exhibiting sex-specific ornamentation. Precopulatory mate preferences and their subsequent effects on breeding success were examined. Female preferences favored large males and when paired with small males, males with high courtship rates. Large females were choosier than small females. No overt male preferences for female size or ornamentation were found; thus, we conclude that female horns in this species are unlikely to have evolved as ornaments via precopulatory male mate choice. Relative horn length in females determined brood ball productivity, whereas female body size and an interaction between male courtship rate and male body size determined brood ball weight. Our results provide evidence for female but not male mate choice. They suggest that attractive males increase reproductive performance, but it is unclear whether the effect of male phenotype is mediated via differences in paternal investment or female differential allocation toward attractive males. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicola L. Watson & Leigh W. Simmons, 2010. "Mate choice in the dung beetle Onthophagus sagittarius: are female horns ornaments?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(2), pages 424-430.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:2:p:424-430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp207
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:2:p:424-430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.