IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i2p233-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

False feeding: the trade-off between chick hunger and caregivers needs in cooperative crows

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Canestrari
  • Rubén Vera
  • Elisa Chiarati
  • José M. Marcos
  • Marta Vila
  • Vittorio Baglione

Abstract

False feeding, where individuals refrain from delivering a food item to a begging dependent young, has been described in several cooperative bird and mammal species, but its function is still unclear. False feeding has been suggested to represent either a deceptive tactic of helpers aimed at showing off provisioning behavior to the rest of the group without paying the costs or a normal provisioning behavior of caregivers mediated by the trade-off between the hunger of the young and caregivers' own conditions. Here, we employed an experimental approach to test whether false feeding in cooperatively breeding carrion crows responds plastically to variations of chicks' and caregivers' needs. In 4 different treatments, we manipulated the hunger of the brood and the conditions of group members by 1) experimentally feeding the chicks, 2) food-supplementing group members during the breeding season or 3) throughout the whole year, and 4) clipping 2 primary feathers from each wing of some individuals to increase the costs of flight. Breeders increased false feeding when the brood was food supplemented (treatment 1) and after their wings were clipped (treatment 4), whereas helpers did not change their false-feeding behavior in response to these treatments. Conversely, helpers decreased false feeding when food was supplemented year-round (treatment 3), whereas fed breeders did not show any significant difference compared with controls. These results indicate that a trade-off between chicks' needs (current reproduction) and caregivers' conditions (future reproduction) modulates the occurrence of false feeding, determining different responses in different group members. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Canestrari & Rubén Vera & Elisa Chiarati & José M. Marcos & Marta Vila & Vittorio Baglione, 2010. "False feeding: the trade-off between chick hunger and caregivers needs in cooperative crows," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(2), pages 233-241.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:2:p:233-241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp177
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. C.M. Young & L.E. Browning & J.L. Savage & S.C. Griffith & Andrew F. Russell, 2013. "No evidence for deception over allocation to brood care in a cooperative bird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 70-81.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:2:p:233-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.