IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i5p961-966.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual quality and reproductive effort mirrored in white wing plumage in both sexes of south polar skuas

Author

Listed:
  • Sveinn Are Hanssen
  • Jan O. Bustnes
  • Torkild Tveraa
  • Dennis Hasselquist
  • Øystein Varpe
  • John-André Henden

Abstract

It is well established that female choice may lead to sexual selection on quality-revealing ornaments in males. However, in many species, both sexes display conspicuous characters, which may reflect individual quality and condition. We examined the correlations between measures of individual condition, reproductive performance and variation in size and whiteness of white wing patches in both sexes of the south polar skua (Catharacta maccormicki). Females with a whiter patch had a lower mean clutch size and higher survival, and males with whiter patches had higher immune responses against the injected immunogen tetanus. Birds with a larger white patch, on the other hand, had a higher mass loss, and females with large white patches laid larger eggs and had reduced survival probability. Thus, variation in 2 measured aspects of the wing patches in the south polar skua seems to mirror a gradient of reproductive investment strategies; from 1) reduced reproductive investment, better immune defense, and higher survival in birds with more intensely white wing patches to 2) high reproductive investment but survival costs in birds with larger patches. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Sveinn Are Hanssen & Jan O. Bustnes & Torkild Tveraa & Dennis Hasselquist & Øystein Varpe & John-André Henden, 2009. "Individual quality and reproductive effort mirrored in white wing plumage in both sexes of south polar skuas," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(5), pages 961-966.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:5:p:961-966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp084
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarah Guindre-Parker & H. Grant Gilchrist & Sarah Baldo & Stephanie M. Doucet & Oliver P. Love, 2013. "Multiple achromatic plumage ornaments signal to multiple receivers," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 672-682.
    2. Gregorio Moreno-Rueda & Herbert Hoi, 2012. "Female house sparrows prefer big males with a large white wing bar and fewer feather holes caused by chewing lice," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 271-277.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:5:p:961-966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.