IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i5p1111-1117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peripheral obstructions influence marmot vigilance: integrating observational and experimental results

Author

Listed:
  • Peter A. Bednekoff
  • Daniel T. Blumstein

Abstract

Animals generally allocate some time during foraging to detecting predators. We used a combination of observations and an experiment to examine how vegetation height and peripheral obstructions influence vigilance by foraging yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris). First, we analyzed a large sample of observations of marmots foraging in nature. Marmots increased vigilance with vegetation height and reared on their hind legs when in tall vegetation. Second, we observed that marmots foraged in locations with lower vegetation than randomly selected sites in the same meadow. These observations suggest that marmots account for what they can see while foraging but do not rule out the influence of other factors correlated with vegetation height. Therefore, we experimentally blocked the view for 3 sides for marmots feeding on a controlled food source. When the apparatus blocked their vigilance, marmots were less vigilant when foraging, often moved outside the apparatus, and showed heightened vigilance while outside the apparatus. Peripheral obstructions explained more of the variance in our experimental than in our observational results. Together, our results demonstrate that marmots employ antipredator behavior to compensate for peripheral obstructions. Long-term studies show that marmots go locally extinct more often in areas with more obstructions to vigilance. Thus, marmots likely face greater predation risk in those areas, despite the behavioral responses documented in this study. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter A. Bednekoff & Daniel T. Blumstein, 2009. "Peripheral obstructions influence marmot vigilance: integrating observational and experimental results," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(5), pages 1111-1117.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:5:p:1111-1117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp104
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:5:p:1111-1117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.