IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i4p773-780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cues, concessions, and inheritance: dominance hierarchies in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenzo Zanette
  • Jeremy Field

Abstract

Hierarchies constitute the base of many social groups. Hence, understanding how they are established is critical. Here we examine how hierarchies are formed in foundresses associations of the common paper wasp Polistes dominulus. By comparing field data with computer simulations, we evaluate order of arrival at the nest, body size, facial color patterns, and within-group kinship structure as determinants of inheritance rank. Hierarchies (ranks 1--5) were experimentally inferred for 53 nests. Overall, the order in which foundresses arrived at the nest and their body size were not significantly correlated with rank. A foundress's rank was negatively correlated with the number of full sisters it had in its group. Highly ranked wasps (ranks 1 and 2) were less likely to share a nest with their full sisters than wasps of lower rank. A wasp's rank was not determined by the relative rank of its nest-mate sisters. A foundress's rank was significantly correlated with the size of its black clypeal marks, but the number of foundresses with clypeal marks in each nest was small. On 15 of 20 nests where wasps with marks were present, only 1 wasp had such marks. Overall, our results suggest that within-group relatedness structure is important in the establishment of dominance hierarchies in P. dominulus foundress associations. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenzo Zanette & Jeremy Field, 2009. "Cues, concessions, and inheritance: dominance hierarchies in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(4), pages 773-780.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:4:p:773-780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonathan P. Green & Ellouise Leadbeater & Jonathan M. Carruthers & Neil S. Rosser & Eric R. Lucas & Jeremy Field, 2013. "Clypeal patterning in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus: no evidence of adaptive value in the wild," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 623-633.
    2. Katharina Hoffmann & Kevin R. Foster & Judith Korb, 2012. "Nest value mediates reproductive decision making within termite societies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1203-1208.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:4:p:773-780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.