IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i3p639-643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sexual coercion in Panorpa scorpionflies?--The function of the notal organ reconsidered

Author

Listed:
  • Dagmar Kock
  • Sierk Engels
  • Christiane Fritsche
  • Klaus P. Sauer

Abstract

Conflict between the sexes over the occurrence and timing of copulation is a common feature of sexual reproduction. In Panorpa scorpionflies (Mecoptera, Panorpidae), sexual conflict occurs over mating duration, and it has been suggested that the notal organ--a clamp-like structure on the males' abdomen--is an adaptation to coerce mating duration, enabling males to prolong mating against female interests. However, as recent studies suggest that female scorpionflies have considerable control over mating decisions, we question this hypothesis and reexamined the function of the notal organ with respect to prolonged mating. We manipulated the notal organs of male Panorpa vulgaris and compared copulation durations achieved by males with functional and nonfunctional notal organs. There were no effects on the overall copulation duration or the period of time a copulation continues after the last nuptial gift has been delivered. We therefore reject the hypothesis that the notal organ is a male adaptation to extend copulation duration against female interests. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Dagmar Kock & Sierk Engels & Christiane Fritsche & Klaus P. Sauer, 2009. "Sexual coercion in Panorpa scorpionflies?--The function of the notal organ reconsidered," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(3), pages 639-643.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:3:p:639-643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp043
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:3:p:639-643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.