IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i3p459-468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mimicry in coral reef fish: how accurate is this deception in terms of color and luminance?

Author

Listed:
  • Karen L. Cheney
  • N. Justin Marshall

Abstract

Batesian and aggressive mimics are considered to be under selective pressure to resemble their models, whereas signal receivers are under selection to discriminate between mimics and models. However, the perceptual ability of signal receivers to discriminate between mimics and models is rarely studied. Here we examined 15 model--mimic coral reef fish pairs using nonsubjective methods to judge the accuracy of mimics in terms of color and luminance. We then investigated the potential ability of fish with various visual systems to discriminate between model and mimic colors using theoretical vision models. We found the majority of mimics closely resembled models in terms of color and luminance from a nonsubjective perspective. However, fish that have potentially trichromatic (3 distinct cone photoreceptors) visual systems with ultraviolet sensitivity had a much better capacity to discriminate between models and mimics compared with fish with midrange sensitivity or dichromatic (2 cone photoreceptors) fish. The spectral reflectance of color patches reflected by models and mimics became more similar with an increase in depth, indicating that signal receivers may be more likely to distinguish mimics from models in habitats located closer to the surface. There was no such change in luminance contrast with depth. The selection pressure on mimics to accurately resemble their model is therefore predicted to vary depending on the visual system of the signal receiver and the light environment. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen L. Cheney & N. Justin Marshall, 2009. "Mimicry in coral reef fish: how accurate is this deception in terms of color and luminance?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(3), pages 459-468.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:3:p:459-468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp017
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:3:p:459-468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.