IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i6p1282-1288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of autotomy and regeneration on detection and capture of prey in a generalist predator

Author

Listed:
  • Kerri M. Wrinn
  • George W. Uetz

Abstract

Many vertebrate and invertebrate taxa have the ability to autotomize and later regenerate appendages and with this process come both costs and benefits. For example, an animal might lose a leg to avoid a predator but as a result become a less effective predator itself. These impacts of autotomy and regeneration on foraging might differ based on habitat complexity as well. We used spiders as a model system to address this. We tested the effects of autotomy and regeneration on prey capture in juvenile Schizocosa ocreata wolf spiders in both artificial and seminatural settings. We tested spiders for prey capture efficiency in a laboratory arena with cricket prey. We also investigated sensory detection of prey through vibration by placing spiders in the same type of arena but visually isolating them from their prey. Subsequent analyses showed no effects of autotomy or regeneration on any measures of prey capture efficiency. Similarly, spiders' vibratory sensory abilities were not significantly affected by autotomy or regeneration. However, we found that when spiders were tested in a seminatural habitat (a leaf litter--filled mesocosm), individuals with a missing or regenerating leg had reduced prey capture rates. This suggests that the negative effects of autotomy and regeneration on foraging might be higher for predators in more complex environments. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerri M. Wrinn & George W. Uetz, 2008. "Effects of autotomy and regeneration on detection and capture of prey in a generalist predator," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(6), pages 1282-1288.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:6:p:1282-1288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arn077
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:6:p:1282-1288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.