IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i5p984-989.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sector fidelity--an advantageous foraging behavior resulting from a heuristic search strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Maria Buchkremer
  • Klaus Reinhold

Abstract

The desert ant Cataglyphis exhibits a strong tendency toward returning to its previous foraging direction when the last foraging run was successful. This behavior is called sector fidelity. A very simple behavioral rule, the τ-rule, has previously been identified as the possible underlying mechanism. Up to now, sector fidelity has been considered a means of facilitating navigation by exploiting familiar landmark information. We propose that sector fidelity enhances the foraging success of ants or other animals in an environment with a heterogeneous resource distribution. We tested the τ-rule and another promising behavioral rule in a very simple environment and modeled the foraging success of these strategies. For each condition, the parameters of the 2 heuristics were optimized using an evolutionary algorithm. The results of our simulations show that the τ-rule performs very well under different resource distributions and availabilities. It can therefore function as a very general adaptive foraging strategy for finding prey in landscapes with heterogeneous resource distributions. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Maria Buchkremer & Klaus Reinhold, 2008. "Sector fidelity--an advantageous foraging behavior resulting from a heuristic search strategy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(5), pages 984-989.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:5:p:984-989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arn057
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:5:p:984-989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.