IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i4p759-763.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eastern chipmunks increase their perception of predation risk in response to titmouse alarm calls

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth A. Schmidt
  • Eunice Lee
  • Richard S. Ostfeld
  • Kathryn Sieving

Abstract

Vocally signaling a predator's presence through alarm calls creates public information regarding risk in the environment. If having this information confers an advantage, eavesdropping behavior, the use of information in signals by individuals other than the primary target, is expected to evolve. Thus, eavesdropping for information on predation risk to avoid predators may be common. We describe the first study to quantify an effect of avian alarm calling on the perceived cost of predation in a mammalian receiver/eavesdropper using the eastern tufted titmouse--eastern chipmunk dyad. We used the technique of giving-up densities to quantify changes in chipmunks' perceived risk of predation while foraging under experimental playbacks of titmouse vocalizations (seet, mobbing, and contact calls), hawk calls, and wood thrush song (control). Titmouse mobbing calls significantly increased chipmunk's perceived risk of predation. Chipmunks also appeared to divert attention (i.e., cost of multitasking) to monitoring alarm call playbacks/assessing predation risk as shown by the absence of density-dependent foraging. In contrast, when foraging during hawk calls (a direct cue of predation risk), chipmunks showed no differences in foraging relative to controls. These results support other published studies that prey respond more strongly to indirect source of information about predation risk than to direct sources. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth A. Schmidt & Eunice Lee & Richard S. Ostfeld & Kathryn Sieving, 2008. "Eastern chipmunks increase their perception of predation risk in response to titmouse alarm calls," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(4), pages 759-763.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:4:p:759-763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arn034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stacia A. Hetrick & Kathryn E. Sieving, 2012. "Antipredator calls of tufted titmice and interspecific transfer of encoded threat information," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 83-92.
    2. Ping Huang & Kathryn E. Sieving & Colette M. St. Mary, 2012. "Heterospecific information about predation risk influences exploratory behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 463-472.
    3. Carrie L. Branch & Todd M. Freeberg, 2012. "Distress calls in tufted titmice (Baeolophus bicolor): are conspecifics or predators the target?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 854-862.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:4:p:759-763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.