IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i3p650-656.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Host shifts favor vibrational signal divergence in Enchenopa binotata treehoppers

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel D. McNett
  • Reginald B. Cocroft

Abstract

For specialized herbivorous insects, shifts to novel host plants can have dramatic evolutionary consequences. If mating traits diverge, assortative mating can develop between ancestral and novel host populations and facilitate speciation. Mating signals may diverge under a variety of scenarios. Signal differences may be a consequence of divergence in correlated traits, such as body size. If local communication environments differ, mating signals may also diverge through selection for enhanced transmission. We tested these hypotheses using 2 closely related species in the Enchenopa binotata complex of treehoppers. Each member of this complex specializes on a different host plant species. Their communication modality may make signal divergence likely after a host shift: like many plant-dwelling insects, Enchenopa communicate using substrate-borne vibrations for which the plant itself is the transmission channel. Each species' mating signal is a relatively pure tone, and differences between species in signal frequency are critical for mate recognition. Whereas no support was found for a correlated selection hypothesis, we found support for a signal transmission hypothesis: both species use a signal frequency that transmits well in their contrasting communication environments, suggesting that host shifts may favor signal divergence and ultimately behavioral isolation. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel D. McNett & Reginald B. Cocroft, 2008. "Host shifts favor vibrational signal divergence in Enchenopa binotata treehoppers," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(3), pages 650-656.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:3:p:650-656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arn017
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:3:p:650-656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.