IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i3p502-507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does ambient noise affect growth and begging call structure in nestling birds?

Author

Listed:
  • Marty L. Leonard
  • Andrew G. Horn

Abstract

Much of the research examining the effects of ambient noise on communication has focused on adult birds using acoustic signals in mate attraction and territory defense. Here, we examine the effects of noise exposure on young birds, which use acoustic signals to solicit food from parents. We found that nestling tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) exposed to playbacks of white noise, within natural amplitude levels, from days 3 to 15 posthatch had begging calls with higher minimum frequencies and narrower frequency ranges than control nestlings raised in nests without added noise. Differences in begging call structure also persisted in the absence of noise. Two days after the noise was removed, experimental nestlings produced calls that were narrower in frequency range and less complex than control nestlings. We found no difference in growth between experimental and control nestlings. Our results suggest that long-term noise exposure affects the structure of nestling begging calls. These effects persist in the absence of noise, suggesting that noise may affect how calls develop. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Marty L. Leonard & Andrew G. Horn, 2008. "Does ambient noise affect growth and begging call structure in nestling birds?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(3), pages 502-507.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:3:p:502-507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arm161
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Allison S Injaian & Lauren Y Poon & Gail L Patricelli, 2018. "Effects of experimental anthropogenic noise on avian settlement patterns and reproductive success," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(5), pages 1181-1189.
    2. Jennifer A. Caldwell & Christopher K. Williams & Margaret C. Brittingham & Thomas J. Maier, 2022. "A Consideration of Wildlife in the Benefit-Costs of Hydraulic Fracturing: Expanding to an E3 Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Lim Ming Han & Zaiton Haron & Khairulzan Yahya & Suhaimi Abu Bakar & Mohamad Ngasri Dimon, 2015. "A Stochastic Simulation Framework for the Prediction of Strategic Noise Mapping and Occupational Noise Exposure Using the Random Walk Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:3:p:502-507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.