IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v18y2007i5p895-904.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is extrapair mating random? On the probability distribution of extrapair young in avian broods

Author

Listed:
  • Jon E. Brommer
  • Peter Korsten
  • Karen M. Bouwman
  • Mathew L. Berg
  • Jan Komdeur

Abstract

A dichotomy in female extrapair copulation (EPC) behavior, with some females seeking EPC and others not, is inferred if the observed distribution of extrapair young (EPY) over broods differs from a random process on the level of individual offspring (binomial, hypergeometrical, or Poisson). A review of the literature shows such null models are virtually always rejected, with often large effect sizes. We formulate an alternative null model, which assumes that 1) the number of EPC has a random (Poisson) distribution across females (broods) and that 2) the probability for an offspring to be of extrapair origin is zero without any EPC and increases with the number of EPC. Our brood-level model can accommodate the bimodality of both zero and medium rates of EPY typically found in empirical data, and fitting our model to EPY production of 7 passerine bird species shows evidence of a nonrandom distribution of EPY in only 2 species. We therefore argue that 1) dichotomy in extrapair mate choice cannot be inferred only from a significant deviation in the observed distribution of EPY from a random process on the level of offspring and that 2) additional empirical work on testing the contrasting critical predictions from the classic and our alternative null models is required. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Jon E. Brommer & Peter Korsten & Karen M. Bouwman & Mathew L. Berg & Jan Komdeur, 2007. "Is extrapair mating random? On the probability distribution of extrapair young in avian broods," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(5), pages 895-904.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:5:p:895-904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arm049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Santema & Bart Kempenaers, 2023. "Experimentally advancing morning emergence time does not increase extra-pair siring success in blue tit males," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(3), pages 346-353.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:5:p:895-904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.