IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v18y2007i5p849-859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Song matching, overlapping, and switching in the banded wren: the sender's perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra L. Vehrencamp
  • Michelle L. Hall
  • Erin R. Bohman
  • Catherine D. Depeine
  • Anastasia H. Dalziell

Abstract

Interpreting receiver responses to on-territory playback of aggressive signals is problematic. One solution is to combine such receiver-perspective experiments with a sender-perspective experiment that allows subjects to demonstrate how their choice of singing strategies is associated with their approach behavior. Here we report the results of a sender-perspective study on the banded wren (Thryothorus pleurostictus) and combine information on context and results of previous receiver-perspective experiments to clarify function. Territorial males were presented with a 5-min playback consisting of song types present in their repertoire. We assessed the degree to which the subjects' song-matching rate, overlapping rate, and song-type versatility were correlated with their approach latency, closeness of approach, latency to first retreat, and time spent close to the speaker. Male age, breeding stage, and features of the playback stimuli were also considered. Song matching was associated with rapid and close approach, consistent with the receiver-perspective interpretation of type matching as a conventional signal of aggressive motivation. Overlapping was associated with earlier retreat and together with the aversive receiver response to our previous overlapping playback experiment suggests that overlapping is a defensive withdrawal signal. High versatility was associated with slower first retreat from the speaker and high levels of reciprocal matching between subject and playback. Males with fledglings sang with particularly low versatility and approached the speaker aggressively, whereas males with nestlings overlapped more and retreated quickly. Finally, older males matched more but overlapped less. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra L. Vehrencamp & Michelle L. Hall & Erin R. Bohman & Catherine D. Depeine & Anastasia H. Dalziell, 2007. "Song matching, overlapping, and switching in the banded wren: the sender's perspective," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(5), pages 849-859.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:5:p:849-859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arm054
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandra L. Vehrencamp & Jesse M. Ellis & Brett F. Cropp & John M. Koltz, 2014. "Negotiation of territorial boundaries in a songbird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1436-1450.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:5:p:849-859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.