IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v18y2007i4p696-700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mate preference for multiple cues: interplay between male and nest size in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus

Author

Listed:
  • Topi K. Lehtonen
  • Simo Rintakoski
  • Kai Lindström

Abstract

Female mating preferences are often based on more than one cue. In empirical studies, however, different mate choice cues are typically treated separately ignoring their possible interactions. In the current work, we studied how male body size and size of the male's nest jointly affect mate preferences of female sand gobies, Pomatoschistus minutus. The females were given a binary choice between males that differed either in body size or size of their nest or both. We found that neither body size nor size of the nest alone affected male attractiveness, but together these 2 cues had a significant effect. Specifically, large males were more popular among females when they had a large nest than when they occupied a small nest. The results suggest that if interaction effects between multiple mate choice cues are not considered, there is a danger of ignoring or underestimating the importance of these cues in sexual selection by female choice. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Topi K. Lehtonen & Simo Rintakoski & Kai Lindström, 2007. "Mate preference for multiple cues: interplay between male and nest size in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(4), pages 696-700.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:4:p:696-700
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arm032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:4:p:696-700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.