IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v18y2007i3p615-620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource assessment in hermit crabs: the worth of their own shell

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Tricarico
  • Francesca Gherardi

Abstract

Animals gather information about the quality of a resource through its assessment and behave accordingly as a result of adaptive motivational changes. In the hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus, we investigated whether an individual was affected in its motivation to acquire a new shell by the quality of the domicile shell (own resource value [ORV]), of the offered shell (external resource value [ERV]), or of both and asked whether its motivation was altered by the information gathered during shell investigation. We analyzed the behavior of hermit crabs inhabiting shells of differing qualities and compared their willingness to acquire an offered shell--optimal, smaller than optimal, or larger than optimal--by measuring the latency to approach it, the number of shell investigation, and its total duration. Crabs in smaller shells (SSs) approached more quick and often the offered shell, whereas crabs in larger shells investigated the offered shell more thoroughly. The readiness of crabs to approach the offered shell and the extent of its investigation were independent of the ERV but were exclusively affected by the ORV, whereas the number and duration of shell investigation did not change with time as investigation proceeded, except for crabs in SSs. These results suggest that P. longicarpus' motivation to acquire a new shell is exclusively influenced by the value of the shell it inhabits rather than by the quality of the shell it is offered and that this species does not gather--or does not use--information about ERV during investigation. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Tricarico & Francesca Gherardi, 2007. "Resource assessment in hermit crabs: the worth of their own shell," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(3), pages 615-620.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:3:p:615-620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arm019
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:3:p:615-620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.