IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v18y2007i3p602-607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rearing conditions influence quality signals but not individual identity signals in Polistes wasps

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth A. Tibbetts
  • Tracy R. Curtis

Abstract

Given the diversity of animal signals, there has been recent interest in categorizing signals into probable functions according to their properties. For example, models predict that signals of quality should be costly and condition dependent, whereas signals of individual identity should be cheap and expressed independently of condition. Here, we test these predictions by comparing the condition dependence of signals of individual identity and quality in Polistes wasps. Polistes fuscatus wasps have black and yellow patterns on the face and abdomen that signal individual identity, whereas Polistes dominulus wasps have black and yellow facial patterns that signal aspects of quality related to dominance. We reared both species with and without supplemental food and examined the facial patterns of the resulting offspring. As predicted, food availability did not influence the development of identity signals in P. fuscatus. In strong contrast, P. dominulus wasps reared with supplemental food had facial patterns that signaled higher levels of quality than P. dominulus reared without supplemental food. Interestingly, the identity and quality signals have different condition dependence, despite being composed of similar pigments, suggesting that signal function has a stronger influence on signal properties than pigmentation. Because body size is often correlated with quality signal elaboration, we also tested how food supplementation influenced offspring size. In both species, supplemented colonies produced smaller offspring than nonsupplemented colonies, suggesting that queens may invest in producing fewer, larger offspring in stressful environments. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth A. Tibbetts & Tracy R. Curtis, 2007. "Rearing conditions influence quality signals but not individual identity signals in Polistes wasps," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(3), pages 602-607.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:3:p:602-607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arm013
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonathan P. Green & Ellouise Leadbeater & Jonathan M. Carruthers & Neil S. Rosser & Eric R. Lucas & Jeremy Field, 2013. "Clypeal patterning in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus: no evidence of adaptive value in the wild," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 623-633.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:3:p:602-607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.