IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i6p998-1003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonindependent mating in a coral reef damselfish: evidence of mate choice copying in the wild

Author

Listed:
  • Denis Goulet

Abstract

Theoretical and experimental studies have shown that mate choice copying is a viable mating strategy under certain conditions. Copying experiments in fish have been conducted primarily in the laboratory, except for one study conducted in the field under artificial conditions. We investigated whether in a wild population of the coral reef whitebelly damselfish (Amblyglyphidodon leucogaster) females copy the choice of other females. Females preferentially spawn with males that have recently mated. To determine if the presence of new eggs in the nest was the reason females chose mates or whether females were mate choice copying, we conducted egg-switching experiments. Eggs from males that recently mated were donated to males that had no eggs. If females are mate choice copying, then donor males with no eggs in the nest should continue to receive additional eggs. If females are using the presence of new eggs as the criterion for mate choice, then foster males with new eggs should receive additional eggs. We found that donor males received new eggs significantly more often than expected. More females mated with donor males than foster males. Furthermore, females preferentially chose to mate with males whom they had seen mating with another female. Females appear to remember the mate choice of other females and choose to mate with those same males even after 1 day. These results suggest that females may be copying the mating decision of other females rather than choosing males based on the presence of new eggs in the nest. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Denis Goulet, 2006. "Nonindependent mating in a coral reef damselfish: evidence of mate choice copying in the wild," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(6), pages 998-1003, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:6:p:998-1003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:6:p:998-1003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.