IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i6p971-978.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple paternity in a philopatric rodent: the interaction of competition and choice

Author

Listed:
  • Peter M. Waser
  • J. Andrew De Woody

Abstract

Paternity confusion is often suggested as the benefit that female mammals accrue by mating with multiple males, but genetic advantages are also possible. Microsatellite-based parentage analyses demonstrate that female banner-tailed kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis) commonly mate with more than one male; we asked how male and female behaviors interact to influence the characteristics of males that sire offspring. Specifically, we compared attributes (age, weight, mobility, relatedness, proximity) of the fathers of 229 known-maternity offspring with those of the other males accessible to the mothers. Adult males living adjacent to each female attempt to monopolize access to her, and the nearest male sires a plurality of offspring, but most mothers' young are fathered by more than one male and littermates are usually half-sibs. Male proximity and mobility, but not size, influence the probability of paternity, suggesting a role for competitive mate searching. Females significantly reduce the inbreeding coefficient of their offspring by mating with males other than (or in addition to) the nearest male. Fathers are less closely related to the mother in years of high density when unrelated males are more accessible to the female. Our results favor the genetic "bet-hedging" hypothesis, whereby females actively but unselectively seek matings with additional males when the male most likely to win in mate competition is costly to her (in this case, genetically less compatible). We anticipate that genetic bet hedging will be common in species whose females are defendable, especially if they are also philopatric. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter M. Waser & J. Andrew De Woody, 2006. "Multiple paternity in a philopatric rodent: the interaction of competition and choice," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(6), pages 971-978, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:6:p:971-978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:6:p:971-978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.