Author
Listed:
- Walter H. Piper
- Charles Walcott
- John N. Mager
- Margaret Perala
- Keren B. Tischler
- Erin Harrington
- Amy J. Turcotte
- Marc Schwabenlander
- Nathan Banfield
Abstract
In many species, young animals learn about various breeding patches in one year and use what they have learned to settle in a promising patch the next. Common loons (Gavia immer) seem good candidates for such prospecting as prebreeders and displaced breeders intrude frequently into breeding territories defended by monogamous pairs yet engage in no extrapair copulations. We tested 3 hypotheses for prospecting in loons. The permanent attributes hypothesis gained little support as we found no consistent differences in quality between territories and no physical or biotic trait that predicted reproductive success in a territory. We found some support for the conspecific attraction hypothesis as intruders were attracted to conspecifics in a lake in the short term; however, intrusions were not more frequent in territories that had experienced regular use by a pair the previous year than in territories that had previously been vacant. Instead, the increase in intrusion rate after a year of chick production supported the habitat-copying hypothesis, which states that floaters use the presence of chicks as a cue to target territories for future attempts at territorial takeover. Despite this system of prospecting, founding of new territories was common. One striking finding was the tendency of territorial breeders to conceal chicks from flying intruders, perhaps to avoid future territorial takeover. Copyright 2006.
Suggested Citation
Walter H. Piper & Charles Walcott & John N. Mager & Margaret Perala & Keren B. Tischler & Erin Harrington & Amy J. Turcotte & Marc Schwabenlander & Nathan Banfield, 2006.
"Prospecting in a solitary breeder: chick production elicits territorial intrusions in common loons,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(6), pages 881-888, November.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:6:p:881-888
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:6:p:881-888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.