IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i5p857-872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The costs of autotomy and regeneration in animals: a review and framework for future research

Author

Listed:
  • Tara Lynne Maginnis

Abstract

Many organisms have the ability to shed an appendage (autotomy) to escape a predator or fouled molting event. Despite its immediate advantage on survivorship, autotomy can have important consequences for locomotion, foraging, survivorship, and/or reproduction. Thus, regeneration is a way that animals alleviate some of the costs associated with losing an appendage. Like autotomy, however, appendage regeneration can have important consequences for a variety of aspects of fitness; in a wide range of amphibians, reptiles, fishes, and arthropods, the allocation of resources to regenerate a lost appendage negatively affects somatic or reproductive growth. Previous research into the costs associated with regeneration has provided a strong framework to explore how trade-offs associated with regeneration may have influenced its evolution. However, all research to date describing the costs and benefits associated with autotomy and regeneration have compared individuals autotomizing and regenerating an appendage with individuals that have never lost an appendage. I suggest that for studies of the evolutionary significance of regeneration, an alternative comparison is between individuals experiencing autotomy without regeneration and individuals experiencing autotomy with regeneration. Future work in this direction promises new insights into the evolution of regenerative tendencies, as well as how regeneration may be influencing animal form and function. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Tara Lynne Maginnis, 2006. "The costs of autotomy and regeneration in animals: a review and framework for future research," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(5), pages 857-872, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:5:p:857-872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zachary Emberts & Ummat Somjee & John J Wiens, 2021. "Damage from intraspecific combat is costly," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1240-1245.
    2. Erin C Powell & Christina J Painting & Glauco Machado & Gregory I Holwell, 2023. "Juvenile leg autotomy predicts adult male morph in a New Zealand harvestman with weapon polymorphism," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(4), pages 613-620.
    3. Zachary Emberts & Christine W. Miller & Daniel Kiehl & Colette M. St. Mary, 2017. "Cut your losses: self-amputation of injured limbs increases survival," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(4), pages 1047-1054.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:5:p:857-872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.