IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i3p419-429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cichlids do not adjust reproductive skew to the availability of independent breeding options

Author

Listed:
  • Dik Heg
  • Ralph Bergmüller
  • Danielle Bonfils
  • Oliver Otti
  • Zina Bachar
  • Reto Burri
  • Gerald Heckel
  • Michael Taborsky

Abstract

Helpers in cooperatively breeding species forego all or part of their reproduction when remaining at home and assisting breeders to raise offspring. Different models of reproductive skew generate alternative predictions about the share of reproduction unrelated subordinates will get depending on the degree of ecological constraints. Concession models predict a larger share when independent breeding options are good, whereas restraint and tug-of-war models predict no effects on reproductive skew. We tested these predictions by determining the share of reproduction by unrelated male and female helpers in the Lake Tanganyika cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher depending on experimentally manipulated possibilities for helper dispersal and independent breeding and depending on helper size and sex. We created 32 breeding groups in the laboratory, consisting of two breeders and two helpers each, where only the helpers had access to a nearby dispersal compartment with (treatment) or without (control) breeding substrate, using a repeated measures design. We determined the paternity and maternity of 1185 offspring from 47 broods using five to nine DNA microsatellite loci and found that: (1) helpers participated in reproduction equally across the treatments, (2) large male helpers were significantly more likely to reproduce than small helpers, and (3) male helpers engaged in significantly more reproduction than female helpers. Interestingly, in four broods, extragroup helper males had fertilized part of the brood. No helper evictions from the group after helper reproduction were observed. Our results suggest that tug-of-war models based on competition over reproduction within groups describe best the reproductive skew observed in our study system. Female breeders produced larger clutches in the treatment compared to the control situation when the large helpers were males. This suggests that male breeder-male helper reproductive conflicts may be alleviated by females producing larger clutches with helpers around. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Dik Heg & Ralph Bergmüller & Danielle Bonfils & Oliver Otti & Zina Bachar & Reto Burri & Gerald Heckel & Michael Taborsky, 2006. "Cichlids do not adjust reproductive skew to the availability of independent breeding options," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(3), pages 419-429, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:3:p:419-429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arj056
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dik Heg & Eva Jutzeler & Jeremy S Mitchell & Ian M Hamilton, 2009. "Helpful Female Subordinate Cichlids Are More Likely to Reproduce," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(5), pages 1-6, May.
    2. Ian M. Hamilton, 2013. "The effects of behavioral plasticity and leadership on the predictions of optimal skew models," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 444-456.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:3:p:419-429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.