IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i2p315-323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preference in patchy landscapes: the influence of scale-specific intake rates and variance in reward

Author

Listed:
  • Kate R. Searle
  • N. Thompson Hobbs
  • Bruce A. Wunder
  • Lisa A. Shipley

Abstract

Understanding the responses of foragers to patchy distributions of resources has formed a fundamental challenge in behavioral ecology. Two currencies have been used to assess the patch preferences of herbivores--intake rate maximization and risk sensitivity. We wished to understand if small mammalian foragers, collared lemmings (Dichrostonyx groenlandicus), choose patches to maximize food intake rate or to reduce risk of starvation in "variable" environments. Moreover, we examined the possibility that maximizing intake rate depends on the spatial scale of patchiness. We designed an experiment offering two alternative patches of food, varying the predictability of food rewards and the "potential intake rate" at different spatial scales. Collared lemmings did not consistently select patches that maximized their intake rate at either scale studied. Instead, they chose patches offering the least variation in food reward over the course of the experiment. Collared lemmings used prior knowledge gained from previous foraging bouts to assess food variability. We interpret these results as evidence for risk-averse foraging strategies, which are predicted for continuous foragers aiming to minimize risk of starvation. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Kate R. Searle & N. Thompson Hobbs & Bruce A. Wunder & Lisa A. Shipley, 2006. "Preference in patchy landscapes: the influence of scale-specific intake rates and variance in reward," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(2), pages 315-323, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:2:p:315-323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arj030
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:2:p:315-323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.