IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i2p403-409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Absence of nepotism toward imprisoned young queens during swarming in the honey bee

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Châline
  • Stephen J. Martin
  • Francis L.W. Ratnieks

Abstract

Nepotism is an important potential conflict in animal societies. However, clear evidence of nepotism in the rearing of queens in social insects is limited and controversial. In the honey bee, Apis mellifera, multiple mating by queens leads to the presence of many patrilines within each colony. When the colonies reproduce through swarming, workers rear a number of new queens, only a few of which will ultimately head a colony. Workers can potentially increase their inclusive fitness by nepotistically favoring full-sister over half-sister queens during the queen rearing and elimination process. Most studies have focused on interactions between workers and immature queens (eggs and larvae) or adult queens who have exited their queen cells. However, adult queens often remain in their queen cells for up to 1 week after emerging from their pupa. In this situation, workers prevent the queens from emerging, feed them, and protect them from other emerged queens. This stage in queen rearing is therefore one in which nepotism could occur. The current study is the first to investigate the kinship between workers and adult queens who have not emerged from their queen cells. We observed the full suite of behaviors expected during this phase of colony reproduction. Although there was no evidence for nepotism in the worker--queen interactions, there was a nonrandom distribution across patrilines of the workers interacting with the queen cells. In addition, in one colony we found differential treatment of fostered (nonkin)-queen cells. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Châline & Stephen J. Martin & Francis L.W. Ratnieks, 2005. "Absence of nepotism toward imprisoned young queens during swarming in the honey bee," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(2), pages 403-409, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:2:p:403-409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ari003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:2:p:403-409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.