IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i2p371-376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The adaptive significance of stealing in a marine bird and its relationship to parental quality

Author

Listed:
  • David A. Shealer
  • Jeffrey A. Spendelow
  • Jeff S. Hatfield
  • Ian C. T. Nisbet

Abstract

Kleptoparasitism (food theft) is a tactic used opportunistically by many foraging birds, but little is known about its fitness benefits. Here we show that habitual kleptoparasitism by individual parent roseate terns (Sterna dougallii) is associated with consistently superior reproductive performance relative to nonkleptoparasitic ("honest") parents, as measured by growth and survival to fledging among their offspring. In broods of two, both chicks of kleptoparasitic parents exhibited superior growth performance during the middle and later stages of the rearing period, relative to chicks of honest parents. This difference was especially pronounced in second-hatched chicks, whose survival is highly variable among years and dependent on food availability. Over a 10-year period, average productivity (number of chicks fledged per pair) was significantly higher among kleptoparasites than among honest parents, with a larger relative difference during years of food shortage. Our study indicates that kleptoparasitism in roseate terns is an important component of parental quality and provides the first evidence that food stealing is associated with enhanced fitness in a facultatively kleptoparasitic seabird. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • David A. Shealer & Jeffrey A. Spendelow & Jeff S. Hatfield & Ian C. T. Nisbet, 2005. "The adaptive significance of stealing in a marine bird and its relationship to parental quality," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(2), pages 371-376, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:2:p:371-376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ari008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:2:p:371-376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.