Author
Listed:
- Alison N. Rutstein
- Lucy Gilbert
- Peter J. B. Slater
- Jeff A. Graves
Abstract
Females are predicted to adjust their reproductive investment in relation to resource quality. In zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), diet quality has been found to influence egg mass both between and within clutches. We tested the prediction that diet quality also affects the quantity of maternally allocated yolk testosterone and 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) between and within clutches. We also investigated whether this pattern differed between male and female eggs. Females laid eggs on a high-quality (HQ) or a low-quality (LQ) diet. Eggs were removed at laying and artificially incubated for 72 h, after which time embryos were sexed and yolk androgens assayed. Diet treatments were then swapped and the experiment repeated. Because there was evidence of a carry-over effect between breeding rounds, we based our conclusions mainly on the results from the first breeding round. On the HQ diet, but not on the LQ diet, infertile eggs contained more testosterone than did fertile eggs in round one. Although there were no overall differences in within-clutch patterns of androgen deposition between the diets, this changed when embryo sex was taken into account. On the HQ diet, testosterone decreased with laying sequence for male eggs but increased with laying sequence for female eggs. On the LQ diet, mothers' male eggs contained more testosterone and DHT than did female eggs regardless of position in the laying sequence. Our data suggest that there are complex, context-dependent mechanisms of sex-specific androgen allocation in this species. Copyright 2005.
Suggested Citation
Alison N. Rutstein & Lucy Gilbert & Peter J. B. Slater & Jeff A. Graves, 2005.
"Sex-specific patterns of yolk androgen allocation depend on maternal diet in the zebra finch,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(1), pages 62-69, January.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:62-69
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:62-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.