IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i1p255-259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Precopulatory choice for cues of material benefits in tree crickets

Author

Listed:
  • Luc F. Bussière
  • Andrew P. Clark
  • Darryl T. Gwynne

Abstract

The relative importance of direct and indirect benefits models of mate choice is a central question in sexual selection, but separating the two models is very difficult because high quality males often provide both better direct benefits and better genes. In tree crickets, Oecanthus nigricornis, females have the opportunity to gain both directly and indirectly from mate choice. Female tree crickets exercise premating choice for large males, but the model underlying this choice is unknown. In this study we examine the proximate cues used by female tree crickets to reject males, and show that the ability of males to provide food is a central cue. In contrast, we find no evidence that the relative size of mates is important in mate rejection. The fact that the major phenotypic cues of male quality are related to food provisioning suggests that the role of genetic benefits in shaping female preferences is limited by the extent to which food provisioning signals genetic quality. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Luc F. Bussière & Andrew P. Clark & Darryl T. Gwynne, 2005. "Precopulatory choice for cues of material benefits in tree crickets," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(1), pages 255-259, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:255-259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh151
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:255-259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.