IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i1p15-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nestmate recognition in the unicolonial ant Formica paralugubris

Author

Listed:
  • Michel Chapuisat
  • Christian Bernasconi
  • Sophie Hoehn
  • Max Reuter

Abstract

In unicolonial populations of ants, individuals can mix freely within large networks of nests that contain many queens. It has been proposed that the absence of aggression in unicolonial populations stems from a loss of nest mate recognition, but few studies have tested this hypothesis. We investigated patterns of aggression and nest mate recognition in the unicolonial wood ant, Formica paralugubris. Little aggression occurred, even between workers from nests separated by up to 5 km. However, when aggression took place, it was directed toward non--nest mates rather than nest mates. Trophallaxis (exchange of liquid food) occurred very frequently, and surprisingly, workers performed significantly more trophallaxis with non--nest mates than with nest mates (bias 2.4:1). Hence, workers are able to discriminate nest mates from non--nest mates. Higher rates of trophallaxis between non--nest mates may serve to homogenize the colony odor or may be an appeasement mechanism. Trophallaxis rate and aggression level were not correlated with geographical distance and did not differ within and between two populations separated by several kilometers. Hence, these populations do not represent differentiated supercolonies with clear-cut behavioral boundaries. Overall, the data demonstrate that unicoloniality can evolve despite well-developed nest mate recognition. Reduced levels of aggression might have been favored by the low rate of interactions with foreign workers, high cost of erroneously rejecting nest mates, and low cost of accepting foreign workers. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Michel Chapuisat & Christian Bernasconi & Sophie Hoehn & Max Reuter, 2005. "Nestmate recognition in the unicolonial ant Formica paralugubris," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(1), pages 15-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:15-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh128
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:15-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.