IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i1p123-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mating rate and fitness in female bean weevils

Author

Listed:
  • Göran Arnqvist
  • Tina Nilsson
  • Mari Katvala

Abstract

Females of most animal taxa mate with several males during their lifespan. Yet our understanding of the ultimate causes of polyandry is incomplete. For example, it is not clear if and in what sense female mating rates are optimal. Most female insects are thought to maximize their fitness by mating at an intermediate rate, but it has been suggested that two alternative fitness peaks may be observed if multiple costs and benefits interact in determining the relationship between mating rate and fitness. We studied the relationship between female fitness and mating rate in the bean weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), a species in which several distinct direct effects of mating to females have been reported. Our results show that female fitness, measured as lifetime offspring production, is lowest at an intermediate mating rate. We suggest that this pattern is the result of multiple direct benefits to mating (e.g., sperm replenishment and hydration/nutrition effects) in combination with significant direct costs to mating (e.g., injury from male genitalia). Females mating at low rates may efficiently minimize the costs of mating, whereas females mating at high rates instead may maximize the benefits of mating. If common, the existence of bimodal relationships between female mating rate and fitness may help explain the large intra- and interspecific variation in the degree of polyandry often seen in insects. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Göran Arnqvist & Tina Nilsson & Mari Katvala, 2005. "Mating rate and fitness in female bean weevils," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(1), pages 123-127, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:123-127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh119
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:123-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.