IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i5p872-882.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intrasexual selection and group spawning in quacking frogs (Crinia georgiana)

Author

Listed:
  • Phillip G. Byrne
  • J. Dale Roberts

Abstract

In the Australian frog Crinia georgiana, matings frequently involve a single female and multiple males (group spawning). The aim of the present study was to demonstrate a connection between variation in the intensity of intrasexual competition, measured by using male density and operational sex ratio (OSR), and the incidence of group spawning. Over a 3-month breeding period, male density and OSR varied substantially and were significantly influenced by climatic conditions. The frequency of agonistic interactions between males was higher in denser choruses. Fights were typically over the possession of sites used to broadcast advertisement calls and were almost always won by larger males. At higher densities, males allocated significantly less time to calling to attract females and spent more time as nonmoving satellites or roaming through an aggregation (searching). However, large males always called more than did small males. The number of males involved in a spawning correlated positively with variation in both male density and OSR. Observation of group spawnings revealed that they generally arose when a satellite male joined a mating pair after a female chose to mate with a calling male or when a female was seized by a searching male and the pair was joined by other searching males. These findings, coupled with past research documenting costs but no benefits of multiple paternity to females, suggest that competitively inferior males force group spawns. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Phillip G. Byrne & J. Dale Roberts, 2004. "Intrasexual selection and group spawning in quacking frogs (Crinia georgiana)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(5), pages 872-882, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:5:p:872-882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh100
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rachel Grant & Tim Halliday & Elizabeth Chadwick, 2013. "Amphibians’ response to the lunar synodic cycle—a review of current knowledge, recommendations, and implications for conservation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 53-62.
    2. Sheri L. Johnson & H. Jane Brockmann, 2013. "Parental effects on early development: testing for indirect benefits of polyandry," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1218-1228.
    3. Carolin Dittrich & Ariel Rodríguez & Ori Segev & Sanja Drakulić & Heike Feldhaar & Miguel Vences & Mark-Oliver Rödel & Michael TaborskyHandling editor, 2018. "Temporal migration patterns and mating tactics influence size-assortative mating in Rana temporaria," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(2), pages 418-428.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:5:p:872-882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.