IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i5p729-734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of food value, predation risk, and pilferage on the caching decisions of Dipodomys merriami

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa A. Leaver

Abstract

Animals that scatter cache their food face a trade-off between the benefits of protecting caches from pilferers and the costs associated with caching. Placing food into a large number of widely spaced caches helps to protect it from pilferage but also involves costs such as greater exposure to predators. I predicted that animals would disperse food into a larger number of more widely spaced caches when caching (1) a preferred food versus a less preferred food and (2) under conditions of low predation risk versus high predation risk. To test these predictions, I examined the scatter-caching decisions of Merriam's kangaroo rats (Dipodomys merriami). D. merriami distributed caches in clumped patterns, regardless of food preference, but they showed a tendency to invest more in a preferred food by distributing caches more widely. Under the relative safety of the new moon, they did not disperse caches more widely, rather they partitioned the same amount of food into a larger number of caches than they did under the full moon, when predation risk is higher. To examine whether their cache spacing decisions had a significant impact on the success of cache pilferers, I measured discovery by pilferers of artificial caches of two food types at different caching distances. Results indicate that the cache spacing behavior of D. merriami functions to protect caches from pilferers, because increased spacing of artificial caches decreased the probability of pilferage for both types of food. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa A. Leaver, 2004. "Effects of food value, predation risk, and pilferage on the caching decisions of Dipodomys merriami," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(5), pages 729-734, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:5:p:729-734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh070
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:5:p:729-734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.