IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i4p543-548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Female collared flycatchers learn to prefer males with an artificial novel ornament

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Qvarnström
  • Veronica Blomgren
  • Chris Wiley
  • Nina Svedin

Abstract

We experimentally investigated whether learning from previous experiences can lead to the establishment of a new mate preference in a wild population of birds. During year one (2001), 63 female collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis) bred together with males that we had provided with a novel trait, a red stripe on their white forehead patch (a sexually selected trait). Some color patterns of birds are largely determined by a few genes, and this experiment was designed to mimic the occurrence of mutations in such genes. In the subsequent year (2002), we found that females with previous experience with red-striped males were more likely to pair with red-striped males (76%) than with control males. By contrast, naïve females (i.e., with no previous experience with red-striped males) were not more likely to pair with red-striped males (44%) than with control males. Females paired with red-striped males produced more offspring than females paired with control males, suggesting that males with the novel trait had become favored by selection. Thus, female collared flycatchers appear to quickly learn to associate a novel trait with a suitable mate that, in turn, leads to assortative mating between local mates (i.e., males with the new trait and females with previous experience of the new trait). Our results provide support for the notion that learning may play an important role when the co-evolution of preferences and preferred traits takes different routes in different populations of the same bird species. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Qvarnström & Veronica Blomgren & Chris Wiley & Nina Svedin, 2004. "Female collared flycatchers learn to prefer males with an artificial novel ornament," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(4), pages 543-548, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:4:p:543-548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh043
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:4:p:543-548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.