IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i2p332-337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natural variation in the sexually selected feather ornaments of crested auklets (Aethia cristatella) does not predict future survival

Author

Listed:
  • Ian L. Jones
  • Fiona M. Hunter
  • Gregory J. Robertson
  • Gail Fraser

Abstract

We evaluated whether sexually selected crest and auricular plume feather ornaments of crested auklet (Aethia cristatella) adults covaried with individual local survival over 11 years (1991--2001). Crested auklets (n = 364 total) were captured near breeding sites, marked with color rings, and local survival estimates were based on color ring resightings at a breeding colony. Survival estimates and relationships among local survival and crest length, auricular plume length, mass and tarsus were evaluated using the program MARK. The best models included four groups, defined by sex and ease of resighting, that differed in resighting rate (p) but not local survival rate (Φ). This model structure effectively explained sources of variation in local survival and resightability among individuals. The best fitting model showed local survival rate varying annually, while accounting for differences in resightability of marked individuals between the sexes and groups (Φ[t], p[sex*ease of resighting]). Annual local survival varied from 0.940 ± 0.029 (SE) in 1993--1994 to 0.767 ± 0.034 in 1997--1998 and averaged 0.859 ± 0.019. We found no evidence that crested auklet local survival covaried with continuous variation in individuals' ornaments. Simulations indicated that our data set was sufficient to detect a relationship between local survival and a covariate that equaled or exceeded a range of 8%. The implications for competing sexual selection mechanisms of empirically measured survival--ornament relationships are controversial, but our study emphasizes that survival estimates for such investigations must control for confounding factors such as resighting rate as well as have sufficient statistical power and time scale to be biologically meaningful. Our results are most consistent with the idea that the conspicuous variation in crested auklet's showy ornaments is arbitrary with respect to individual viability as quantified by their long-term survival. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian L. Jones & Fiona M. Hunter & Gregory J. Robertson & Gail Fraser, 2004. "Natural variation in the sexually selected feather ornaments of crested auklets (Aethia cristatella) does not predict future survival," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(2), pages 332-337, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:2:p:332-337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:2:p:332-337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.