Author
Abstract
Males of many species are characterized by alternative mating tactics. In bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus), some males delay maturation and become "parentals" while other males mature precociously and become "cuckolders." Parentals use an overt, territorial mating tactic, defending a nest and courting females. Cuckolders instead use a sneaking tactic to parasitize parentals. It has previously been shown that parentals that are heavily cuckolded provide less care to their young, yet females do not appear to discriminate against cuckolders, and they may actually release more eggs when a cuckolder is present than when spawning only with a parental. Here I examined growth rate of fry of known paternity through the yolk-sac stage of development using complementary laboratory and field studies to assess a potential indirect benefit for females that mate with cuckolders. Comparison of maternal half-siblings sired in vitro shows that cuckolder offspring grow faster and to a larger size than parental offspring while feeding endogenously on their yolk sac. Because both food resource and maternal genes are equivalent across treatments, these data indicate a genetic difference in growth between the two male life histories. In the field, fry from nests that have proportionately more cuckolder offspring are larger when they emerge from the nest. This increased size can lead to threefold higher survivorship for cuckolder offspring than parental offspring from Hydra canadensis predation, a major predator of bluegill fry. These results are discussed in the context of mate choice for direct and indirect benefits and in the context of the evolution of alternative mating tactics. Copyright 2004.
Suggested Citation
Bryan D. Neff, 2004.
"Increased performance of offspring sired by parasitic males in bluegill sunfish,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(2), pages 327-331, March.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:2:p:327-331
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:2:p:327-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.