Author
Listed:
- Jabus G. Tyerman
- Bernard D. Roitberg
Abstract
Aphid species using a defensive soldier caste offer us the opportunity to study allocation decisions by eusocial groups, without the hindrance of genetic dissimilarity between colony members, which often impair studies involving Hymenopteran or Isopteran systems. When the entire aphid clone is considered the adaptive unit of organization, understanding soldier allocation strategies is tantamount to understanding the outcome of the tradeoff between clonal growth (i.e., asexual reproduction) and clonal defense. Under this framework, we present the results of a dynamic programming effort aimed at determining the optimal ontogeny of defensive allocation strategies by eusocial clonal organisms. We consider the allocation decision for clones with both obligately and facultatively sterile soldiers, under various levels of predation, and favorable and unfavorable ecological conditions. We test predictions of the model with the eusocial aphid, Pemphigus spyrothecae. Our model predicts that defensive investment should be dependent on the time of the season, with clones discounting defense nearer the end of season. Defensive investment should also vary inversely with clonal productivity and be sensitive to the current state (e.g., level of defense) of the clone. Census data collected in Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada, conform to patterns of clonal composition derived from allocation decisions generated in the model. Finally, qualitative predictions about patterns of clonal organization under "good" and "poor" ecological conditions were upheld by comparing clones in preferred and less-preferred galling sites. Copyright 2004.
Suggested Citation
Jabus G. Tyerman & Bernard D. Roitberg, 2004.
"Factors affecting soldier allocation in clonal aphids: a life-history model and test,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(1), pages 94-101, January.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:1:p:94-101
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:1:p:94-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.