IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i6p897-901.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conspecifics enhance egg production in an egg-carrying bug

Author

Listed:
  • Mari Katvala
  • Arja Kaitala

Abstract

Variation in host availability and quality is likely to affect female decision making on when to lay eggs in arthropods. In the present study, we show a case in which female reproduction is limited by the availability of conspecifics in a species in which females preferably oviposit on conspecific bodies. Female golden egg bugs (Phyllomorpha laciniata; Heteroptera, Coreidae) deposit eggs mainly on the bodies of both male and female conspecifics. Bugs other than parents carry most eggs. Egg carrying is costly for individuals. A few eggs are laid on the bug's food plant, but in most habitats, those eggs do not survive owing to intensive ant predation. We explored if conspecific presence affects female egg production (eggs laid and eggs in reproductive tract) in the field. In our experiment, conspecific presence (two females enclosed with food plant) increased female egg-laying rate and egg production compared with that of females that were alone with the food plant. In nature, gaining a conspecific host is difficult, and the encounter rate of conspecifics (i.e., operational host density) is likely to be important for female reproduction. There are opposing interests between an egg-laying female and the recipient (male or female) because most eggs are dumped on individuals that are not the parent of the eggs. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Mari Katvala & Arja Kaitala, 2003. "Conspecifics enhance egg production in an egg-carrying bug," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(6), pages 897-901, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:6:p:897-901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arg078
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:6:p:897-901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.