IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i5p602-606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The cost of aggregation: juvenile salmon avoid sharing winter refuges with siblings

Author

Listed:
  • Siaˆn W. Griffiths
  • John D. Armstrong
  • Neil B. Metcalfe

Abstract

Kin selection advantages are usually accrued by individuals that associate with close relatives. But aggregation may also be costly, by increasing the risk of predation or resource competition, for example. As a result, individuals should increase their inclusive fitness by trading the costs and benefits of kin association and aggregation. Studies of kin selection to date have focused on situations where there is ample opportunity for kin-biased behavior and therefore for the formation of kin groups. Here we used juvenile Atlantic salmon to test an alternative strategy: that under conditions where the potential for kin-biased behavior is negligible, individuals should, when aggregating, avoid rather than associate with kin to avoid imposing the costs of aggregation upon close relatives. By testing salmon during winter, when juveniles shelter inactively in streambed refuges, we tested whether individuals associate with or avoid their siblings at a time when the opportunity for kin-directed behaviors is restricted. Our results provide the first evidence of kin avoidance in nonreproductive animals studied under semi-natural conditions. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Siaˆn W. Griffiths & John D. Armstrong & Neil B. Metcalfe, 2003. "The cost of aggregation: juvenile salmon avoid sharing winter refuges with siblings," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(5), pages 602-606, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:5:p:602-606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arg050
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:5:p:602-606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.