IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i1p10-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sex-specific differences in reindeer calf behavior and predation vulnerability

Author

Listed:
  • Jon H. Mathisen
  • Arild Landa
  • Roy Andersen
  • Joseph L. Fox

Abstract

According to reproductive strategy theory, males in polygamous breeding systems should invest in morphological or behavioral features that increase reproductive success. When the early development of such traits conflicts with predator protection, we expect that male calves will exhibit risk-taking behavior, such as high activity level and increasing distance from mother, to a greater extent than female calves. We investigated sex differences in mother--calf distance, calf activity levels, and calf mortality in a semi-domesticated reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) population. The results show that male calves stray farther away from their mothers, exhibit a higher level of locomotive behavior in terms of play and walking, and are more vulnerable to predation than are female calves. Although mother--calf distance increased over time in 1- to 6-month-old calves, no evidence was apparent for an increase in sex difference in mother--calf distance over this period. The results suggest a trade-off between predation vulnerability and investments in behavioral traits thought to be important for future reproductive success and suggest that these sex-related differences in behavior are apparent as early as 6 months of age. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Jon H. Mathisen & Arild Landa & Roy Andersen & Joseph L. Fox, 2003. "Sex-specific differences in reindeer calf behavior and predation vulnerability," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(1), pages 10-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:1:p:10-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:1:p:10-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.