IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i6p838-843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model parents: is full compensation for reduced partner nest attendance compatible with stable biparental care?

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine M. Jones
  • Graeme D. Ruxton
  • Pat Monaghan

Abstract

Previous models have suggested that biparental care will be evolutionarily stable when each parent only partially compensates for decreases in effort by their partner. We investigated a system where breeding success is an accelerating function of parental effort. This could occur in species with a high predation level--for example, in a dense sea-bird colony or in species where eggs or young are very prone to cooling. In these cases we found that parents will fully compensate for decreased partner effort, or else they will abandon the breeding attempt altogether. We use a second graphical model to show that biparental care can exist under a situation of full compensation for reduced partner effort if neither parent can do all the care alone. Each parent will abandon the breeding attempt if his or her condition falls below a certain threshold. If the participation of both parents is necessary for the breeding attempt to be successful, then neither parent will want to force their partner to abandon by making them work so hard that they fall below the condition threshold. Because abandonment by oen partner means the failure of the breeding attempt, each individual will do at least enough work so that the partner will not abandon, resulting in biparental care. There will be a region of conflict between the parents, within which the conflict can be resolved in various ways. Possible resolutions of this conflict, and the consequences and applications of the model, are discussed. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine M. Jones & Graeme D. Ruxton & Pat Monaghan, 2002. "Model parents: is full compensation for reduced partner nest attendance compatible with stable biparental care?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(6), pages 838-843, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:6:p:838-843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James L. Savage & Andrew F. Russell & Rufus A. Johnstone, 2013. "Maternal costs in offspring production affect investment rules in joint rearing," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 750-758.
    2. Tina A Barbasch & Rebecca Branconi & Robin Francis & Madison Pacaro & Maya Srinivasan & Geoffrey P Jones & Peter M Buston, 2021. "Negotiations over parental care: a test of alternative hypotheses in the clown anemonefish," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1256-1265.
    3. Daiping Wang & Wenyuan Zhang & Shuai Yang & Xiang-Yi Li Richter, 2023. "Sex differences in avian parental care patterns vary across the breeding cycle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Alfréd Trnka & Tomáš Grim, 2013. "To compensate or not to compensate: testing the negotiation model in the context of nest defense," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 223-228.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:6:p:838-843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.