IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i5p705-712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A state-based model of sperm allocation in a group-breeding salamander

Author

Listed:
  • W. Edwin Harris
  • Jeffrey R. Lucas

Abstract

We developed a dynamic program of optimal sperm allocation for group-breeding species. Using the small-mouthed salamander, Ambystoma texanum, as a model organism, we considered how spermatophore deposition is affected by sperm reserves, male and female number in breeding aggregations, and time during the breeding season. Parameters for part of the model were based on field data of breeding-pond arrival times for both sexes and on laboratory spermatophore deposition data. Our model included simulations of three different seasonal patterns of female arrival rate: decreasing (as in A. texanum), increasing, and uniform. General predictions are (1) Increased male competitor numbers at breeding aggregations should cause a reduction in spermatophore allocation. (2) Increased female numbers at breeding aggregations should increase spermatophore allocation. (3) The effect of current sperm reserve levels on sperm allocation depends on the seasonal distribution of the mean number of females per male during the breeding season: (3a) If relative female availability decreases over time, males with low sperm reserves should limit allocation early in the season but should deposit maximal sperm loads late in the season; (3b) if female availability increases over time, males with low sperm loads should limit allocation throughout the entire breeding season; and (3c) if female availability is constant, sperm reserves are predicted to have little effect on spermatophore allocation tactics. We discuss model predictions in the context of current sperm allocation theory. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • W. Edwin Harris & Jeffrey R. Lucas, 2002. "A state-based model of sperm allocation in a group-breeding salamander," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(5), pages 705-712, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:5:p:705-712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:5:p:705-712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.