IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i5p632-636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A life-history perspective on strategic mating effort in male scorpionflies

Author

Listed:
  • Leif Engqvist
  • Klaus Peter Sauer

Abstract

In species with high male mating effort, there is a trade-off between mating effort spent in a current mating and resources left for future matings. Consequently, to maximize their reproductive success, males have to invest strategically, saving resources in matings with low reproductive gain for future, more valuable matings. However, as males age, the expected future reproductive success constantly declines. Thus, the importance of resource rationing may drastically change during a lifetime. Males of the scorpionfly Panorpa cognata offer females a costly nuptial gift before copulation, which functions as male mating effort. Resources for the production of these salivary masses are severely limited for males in poor condition. We found that males invested more in copulations with high-quality females than in copulations with low-quality females. However, males ceased to discriminate as they became older. Old males, with a relative small number of expected future matings, did not invest differentially in copulations with high- versus low-quality females. In copulations with low-quality females, males invested more in late than in initial matings, whereas in matings with high-quality females, time of mating had no influence on mating effort. These results imply that males adaptively change their resource allocation strategy during the course of the season. Initial matings seem to be characterized by male prudence; in later matings, males seem to adopt a more opportunistic mating strategy. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Leif Engqvist & Klaus Peter Sauer, 2002. "A life-history perspective on strategic mating effort in male scorpionflies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(5), pages 632-636, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:5:p:632-636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:5:p:632-636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.