IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i3p337-343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protandry models and their application to salmon

Author

Listed:
  • Yolanda E. Morbey

Abstract

Mating systems characterized by restricted breeding seasons, male polygamy, and female monogamy are common among animals. In such systems (e.g., butterflies), the earlier emergence of males than females to breeding areas (protandry) is a typical phenological pattern. Protandry likely results from a timing strategy that maximizes mating opportunities by males. In Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), males typically arrive at the spawning grounds in advance of females. Using arrival-timing models, I found that under the mate-opportunity hypothesis, the mating system of salmon favors protandry. Protandry is predicted under a range of competitive scenarios, and the degree of protandry is especially sensitive to the duration of male spawning activity. Greater protandry is expected with increasing population sex ratio (i.e., more males) when there is mate guarding, but lower protandry is expected with increasing population sex ratio when interference competition among males reduces male longevity. The timing of unequal competitors is expected to be similar, but among years, protandry may be less variable in the better competitor. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Yolanda E. Morbey, 2002. "Protandry models and their application to salmon," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(3), pages 337-343, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:3:p:337-343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:3:p:337-343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.