IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i2p163-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The spatial habitat structure of host populations explains the pattern of rejection behavior in hosts and parasitic adaptations in cuckoos

Author

Listed:
  • Eivin Røskaft
  • Arne Moksnes
  • Bård G. Stokke
  • Csaba Moskát
  • Marcel Honza

Abstract

In this article we present tentative support for predictions derived from a spatial habitat structure hypothesis arguing that common cuckoos Cuculus canorus, the most common obligate brood parasite in Europe, only breed in areas where they have access to vantage points in trees. Thus, species in which some populations breed near trees while other populations breed farther from trees have a different cuckoo--host population dynamic than species in which all populations always breed in the vicinity of trees. Parasitism rate, mimicry of brood parasite eggs with those of the hosts, and rejection behavior of hosts varies with the host breeding habitat. Cuckoos are best adapted to exploit species in which some populations breed near trees while other populations breed in open areas because such hosts are not always accessible to cuckoos, and thus gene flow among unparasitized and parasitized populations delays the evolution of host adaptations. Adaptive behavior in cuckoos as well as in their hosts can be predicted from the spatial habitat structure hypothesis. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Eivin Røskaft & Arne Moksnes & Bård G. Stokke & Csaba Moskát & Marcel Honza, 2002. "The spatial habitat structure of host populations explains the pattern of rejection behavior in hosts and parasitic adaptations in cuckoos," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(2), pages 163-168, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:2:p:163-168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:2:p:163-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.